Monthly Archives: August 2008

Reducing size of SQL Server 2000: why I am not a DBA?!

OK, so I’ve been stupid and, as a result, my SQL Server 2000 DB takes up over 20GB both on the logs and the content.  Ridiculous.  I even know why.

So first thing is first – I got rid of all the logs.

Now I need to figure out how to reduce the bloated tables themselves…

More to come soon…

 

Nikita’s LJ Tags:

Leave a comment

Filed under Tech

I hate MSFT Outlook

MSFT Outlook is a piece of crap.  I hate it.  It can bite me.  It can bite me hard.  it freezes on me on a regular basis, when I do send/receive often not only does Outlook stop responding as if it is single-threaded, but the entire computer starts responding with                      adelayreallyreallyfastafterItypedsomethingin.  I mean, come on!  I like MSFT.  It’s a good company that has some stellar products, but this shit is ridiculous.

And yet, I can’t switch out, because nothing else does task management integrated with emails, which is something I really need (no, GMail hacks are not convenient – that’s why they are called hacks).  If someone has some ideas on what I can use, would much appreciate.

Nikita’s LJ Tags: ,

Leave a comment

Filed under Tech

Managing information

Another application for a blog as a journal is as a scrapbook.  For example, I posted a response on Digg:

Yay!  It’s ok for women to have excisions in Somalia and to have the boot driven into their vaginas in the Congo!  It’s ok that there are honor killings in Iran and that Hezbollah is screwing up Lebanon, It’s ok that there is no freedom of speech or thought in the 21st century in some countries and that civilians are being used and oppressed rather than represented – it’s all ok JUST SO LONG AS I GET TO SAVE THE WORLD BY GETTING A HYBRID AND ACCUSE MY GOVERNMENT OF PROFITEERING!!!

Ugh…  I am sorry, but please stop painting McCain black and Obama white (all puns intended).  We are living in a complex world, but your refusal to see anything beyond the edge of your nicely trimmed lawn is nauseating.  I too am against the draft, but I don’t hop on every opportunity to further my political point.  Both McCain and Obama are intelligent people.  Stop this political crap of bullshit that Digg has turned into.

As a response to this BS.  So what’s happening on the web is that there are two types of people:

  1. People who know what’s going on, but don’t have a lot of time
  2. People who are clueless, but have all the time in the world.

I have some ideas on how this balance could be rectified systematically by creating a way to measure quality of content rather than volume, but another way may be to empower those very few who know something and care…  a scrapbook may be just such a tool – one that allows reuse of content in online discussions.

Nikita’s LJ Tags: ,

Leave a comment

Filed under Info Management

Sponsorship: Enhance-Tech and Seagate

So my company is being sponsored (through hardware) by Enhance-Tech and Seagate.  Big thank you to both.  We are also waiting on a sponsorship from a RAID card manufacturer, but decided to start putting together the file box anyway.

So we got an E10 – PM box.  So far, noted the following:

  • The hardware came in two cardboard boxes.  Extra padding or… ?
  • Despite no manual coming with the box, the setup was very easy.  Good construction.

So far, very excited.  Can’t wait to get the RAID card to give this thing a try.

Nikita’s LJ Tags: ,

Leave a comment

Filed under Business, JoVE, Tech

How do we work/browse?

What are the tid-bits that we publish?

  • Things that we find interesting
    • Don’t need to tag ourselves.  Collective tagging works just fine
  • Our thoughts where we need help
    • Should allow for collaboration beyond “comments”
  • Our notes that we want to retain
    • Need better way to catalogue

What’s the value from reading other people’s work:

  • Being updated – low value
  • If we are close, let’s hang out – location: focused micro-blogging  Why?
    • Professional proximity
    • Friends / Dating
  • Learn new things relevant to my line of work – helps my business
  • Help friends – feelgood, credibility.

Conclusion: a blog should evolve into a stream that allows multiple points of standardized access.  There should be RSS feeds for different thoughts and it is important not to just have proper tools to create content, but also to consume it.

Leave a comment

Filed under Musings

Video: Lifelike animation heralds new era for computer games – Times Online

Very cool.

Video: Lifelike animation heralds new era for computer games – Times Online

Nikita’s LJ Tags: , ,

Leave a comment

Filed under News

Universal Truth – Imposition

I had an interesting discussion today with Ajay, a friend of Darya’s.  He suggested, more playing the devil’s advocate it seems than anything else, that what I see as truth is my truth: a view of convenience.  Intuitively, of course, I feel it is BS – if someone doesn’t agree with my view that honor killings are wrong, they are either stuck in a different time or are idiots.  Yet, intuition is knee-jerk and ugly and is not always productive.

So how can I deal with this suggestion?  Well, 2 thoughts come to mind:

First Reasoning – Universal Truth

in all religious, the intelligentsia, the evolved elite arrive at the same natural conclusions – the core human values, which amount to respect of individual rights.  Yet this might not be sufficient.

Second Reasoning – Descartes.

When Descartes was trying to prove our existence, he asked the question that was something like “What if everything we feel is a lie?  What if our brains are in some jars and some evil genius is feeding us signals?  How do we know we exist?”  Then he had to cast away all information leaving only the core.  And the core is that we doubt our own existence.  With everything else under question, there is still something that remains.  And this lead to the famous “I doubt – therefore I exist”, which is “I think, therefore I am”.

In which case I propose the second reasoning.  If we assume that all schools of thought are fallible without exception, then I think the following fundamental values should apply because they assume that every statement can be wrong:

  1. nobody has the right to impose upon anybody else
  2. in event of imposition, a judgement and imposition can be made by someone trusted by the majority of society that accepted clause 1.

What does it mean?  Ultimately, we all strive towards a society where every member is in a bubble that nobody else can get into unless they are invited.  However, the world is far from perfect, so 1 will most certainly not always be the case.  Then, when there is imposition, it is dealt with through structures accepted by those who accept the fundamental premise that we imposition should be minimal.

So, as an example, let’s take excision in some Islamic cultures.  This is something that clearly imposes upon girls.  Since it is an imposition, the judgement should be made by structures who are endowed with a right to solve this problem by societies that have accepted 1 – so the Western society can make this call.

Same would go for, say, spanking a child.  So imposition is ok so long as members of the society who respect human rights accept the imposition as necessary.

Of course, this still doesn’t answer the question of why clause 1 is something that should be held to be universally true when it actually goes against so many schools of thought.  My answer to this is that every school of thought seeks balance and peace and ability to live lives that do not intersect at all is ultimate balance and peace.  Thus, this is actually a common purpose despite not being explicit.

Although all this is a moot point.  I think that what makes us human is the desire to be happy.  Whether it is submitting as part of Islam, Christianity, or pursuit of business enterprise.  And if we assume this fundamental desire to be universally, clause 1 is the ultimate individual implementation.  Philosophically there are many problems with this, yet, philosophy seems completely irrelevant given the injustices some people on this earth experience at the present time…

What is bothering me in that I Ayaan’s clarity of thought.  This issue should be so clear, so transparent, yet I find myself grasping for straws to fight moral relativism.  What am I missing?

Leave a comment

Filed under Musings, Politics